Thanks for the comment and for reading the article. Your point is well taken. The point I was trying to make was he was sublime in his QF against Rublev, came out against Novak a little all over the place temperamentally. Came back very strong in the third and fourth- and then a little flat in the 5th. The injury was a factor, agreed, and I should have alluded to it as well. But, I was more focused on the inconsistency and temperament factor perhaps. But, thanks for pointing it out again.